linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add rockchip,rk3562-saradc string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5gq6yd5kwu6xhbuhrg5nmgl3llgkrqw2qvuschj5yjctuiqzoz@p6rol75kvrfc>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:57:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add rockchip,rk3562-saradc
 string

On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:40:41PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Add rockchip,rk3562-saradc compatible string.
> The saradc on rk3562 is v2 controller, with 10bit width which is different
> with rk3588.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> index fd93ed3991e0..da8bc6f50a32 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> @@ -16,9 +16,11 @@ properties:
>        - const: rockchip,rk3066-tsadc
>        - const: rockchip,rk3399-saradc
>        - const: rockchip,rk3588-saradc
> +      - const: rockchip,rk3562-saradc
>        - items:
>            - const: rockchip,rk3576-saradc
>            - const: rockchip,rk3588-saradc
> +          - const: rockchip,rk3562-saradc

This makes no sense - why suddenly 3576 is affected? Nothing in commit
msg is explaining this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof