linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek,mt6779-keypad: add more compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2cikysv5mwmc4utckjg7iaqx66ncwu3nsxd4kqipj3gw4mymbf@3gipwanf44ji>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:12:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>
Cc: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>, 
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>, 
	Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>, Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>, 
	Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek,mt6779-keypad: add more
 compatibles

On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:26:19PM -0300, Val Packett wrote:
> Add compatibles for SoCs using this device (mt8183, mt8365, mt8516).

This we see from the diff. Say what is less visible, e.g. are they fully
compatible with other variants? Partially?

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof