lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0dd42f11-2c2d-4fab-a115-2b0c8c69952d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 16:04:05 +0530
From: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nehagholkar@...a.com, abhishekd@...a.com,
        kernel-team@...a.com, david@...hat.com, nphamcs@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, kbusch@...a.com,
        ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/5] memory: move conditionally defined enums use
 inside ifdef tags


On 12/11/24 03:07, Gregory Price wrote:
> NUMA_HINT_FAULTS and NUMA_HINT_FAULTS_LOCAL are only defined if
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING is defined, but are used outside the tags in
> numa_migrate_check().  Fix this.
>
> TNF_SHARED is only used if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING is enabled, so
> moving this line inside the ifdef is also safe - despite use of TNF_*
> elsewhere in the function.  TNF_* are not conditionally defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> ---
>   mm/memory.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 83fd35c034d7..6ad7616918c4 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -5573,14 +5573,14 @@ int numa_migrate_check(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf,
>   	/* Record the current PID acceesing VMA */
>   	vma_set_access_pid_bit(vma);
>   
> -	count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_HINT_FAULTS);
>   #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

IIUC,|do_huge_pmd_numa_page|() and|do_numa_page()|  are executed only if
|CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING|  is enabled (|pte_protnone()|  and|pmd_protnone()|
return 0 if|CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING|  is disabled).

Given this, do we still need the|#ifdef|?

> +	count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_HINT_FAULTS);
>   	count_memcg_folio_events(folio, NUMA_HINT_FAULTS, 1);
> -#endif
>   	if (folio_nid(folio) == numa_node_id()) {
>   		count_vm_numa_event(NUMA_HINT_FAULTS_LOCAL);
>   		*flags |= TNF_FAULT_LOCAL;
>   	}
> +#endif
>   
>   	return mpol_misplaced(folio, vmf, addr);
>   }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ