lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241226224521.2d159a02@batman.local.home>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:45:21 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Peter Zijlstra
 <peterz@...radead.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan
 Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Zheng
 Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>, Martin Kelly
 <martin.kelly@...wdstrike.com>, Christophe Leroy
 <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Mark
 Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH] build: Make weak functions visible in
 kallsyms

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:35:18 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 at 13:49, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > But then, when the linker removes these functions because they were
> > overridden, the code does not disappear, leaving the pointers in the
> > __mcount_loc locations.  
> 
> Btw, does this actually happen when the compiler does the mcount thing for us?

Yes.

I believe the issue is that the mcount_loc is created during the
compile phase, and it just points to the call to fentry/mcount. The
linker phase doesn't remove the code, just the symbols that are
overridden. That means the pointer to the fentry/mcount calls still
point to the same locations, as the code is still there.

I even sent an email about this to the gcc folks, and Peter responded
basically explaining the above.

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014210841.5a4764de@gandalf.local.home/

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ