[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241228181546.1315328-1-alison@she-devel.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 10:15:46 -0800
From: alison@...-devel.com
To: corbet@....net
Cc: gratian.crisan@...com,
triegel@...hat.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
alison@...-devel.com,
achaiken@...ora.tech
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: locking: update libc support status of PI futexes
From: Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>
Update the text of futex-requeue-pi.rst to explain that, because of a
conflict between POSIX requirements and ABI constraints, glibc does
not support requeueing of PI futexes. Add some information about
librtpi, a library which provides an implementation of condition
variables which supports priority inheritance.
Signed-off-by: Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>
---
Documentation/locking/futex-requeue-pi.rst | 47 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/futex-requeue-pi.rst b/Documentation/locking/futex-requeue-pi.rst
index dd4ecf4528a4..6ad7f0c9ea4b 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/futex-requeue-pi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/futex-requeue-pi.rst
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to
be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes. This support implies that
upon a successful futex_wait system call, the caller would return to
user space already holding the PI futex. The glibc implementation
-would be modified as follows::
+would need to be modified as follows::
/* caller must lock mutex */
@@ -78,10 +78,20 @@ would be modified as follows::
futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
}
-The actual glibc implementation will likely test for PI and make the
-necessary changes inside the existing calls rather than creating new
-calls for the PI cases. Similar changes are needed for
-pthread_cond_timedwait() and pthread_cond_signal().
+The actual glibc libpthread implementation has not made these changes,
+nor has it made similar changes needed for pthread_cond_timedwait()
+and pthread_cond_signal(). The reason is that POSIX has a strict
+notion of "eligible" waiters on a futex, which means the set of
+waiters created before a given signal is sent. Because userspace has
+no atomic way to perform lock operations together with the futex
+system call, the implementation must also carefully guard against lost
+wakeups on a multicore system. These constraints mean that the
+libpthread condition variable would need an ABI break into order to
+support requeueing. The fundamental underlying difficulty stems from
+the limited size of the futex word, which is 32 bits even on 64-bit
+systems. See
+https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/events/rt-summit2016/pthread-condvars
+for details.
Implementation
--------------
@@ -130,3 +140,30 @@ either pthread_cond_broadcast() or pthread_cond_signal() acquire the
mutex prior to making the call. FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI requires that
nr_wake=1. nr_requeue should be INT_MAX for broadcast and 0 for
signal.
+
+librtpi
+--------------
+
+librtpi (https://gitlab.com/linux-rt/librtpi) implements condition
+variables which closely follow the guidance above. The librtpi
+implementation adds a new mutex parameter to the waiting and signaling
+functions in order to support the requirement that mutexes with the
+PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT attribute always have an owner:
+
+int pi_cond_wait(pi_cond_t *cond, pi_mutex_t *mutex);
+int pi_cond_signal(pi_cond_t *cond, pi_mutex_t *mutex);
+
+Realtime userspace applications which rely on librtpi must therefore
+make code changes.
+
+librtpi works with the kernel scheduler to wake the highest-priority
+waiters on a futex in FIFO order. The code is much simpler than
+glibc's at the cost of omitting some POSIX-mandated features. librtpi
+has no notion of POSIX's eligible waiters, and it does not support
+robust, process-private or PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutexes.
+
+other C libraries
+--------------
+
+Like glibc's NPTL, other prominent threading libraries like musl,
+Thread Building Blocks and Boost do not implement futex requeueing.
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists