linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/14] cpumask: use cpumask_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241228184949.31582-8-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 10:49:39 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/14] cpumask: use cpumask_next_wrap() where appropriate

Now that cpumask_next{_and}_wrap() is wired to generic
find_next_bit_wrap(), we can use it in cpumask_any{_and}_distribute().

This automatically makes the cpumask_*_distribute() functions to use 
small_cpumask_bits instead of nr_cpumask_bits, which itself is a good
optimization.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
 lib/cpumask.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index c9a9b451772a..d7cce2aaebc2 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -174,8 +174,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
 	/* NOTE: our first selection will skip 0. */
 	prev = __this_cpu_read(distribute_cpu_mask_prev);
 
-	next = find_next_and_bit_wrap(cpumask_bits(src1p), cpumask_bits(src2p),
-					nr_cpumask_bits, prev + 1);
+	next = cpumask_next_and_wrap(prev, src1p, src2p);
 	if (next < nr_cpu_ids)
 		__this_cpu_write(distribute_cpu_mask_prev, next);
 
@@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 
 	/* NOTE: our first selection will skip 0. */
 	prev = __this_cpu_read(distribute_cpu_mask_prev);
-	next = find_next_bit_wrap(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits, prev + 1);
+	next = cpumask_next_wrap(prev, srcp);
 	if (next < nr_cpu_ids)
 		__this_cpu_write(distribute_cpu_mask_prev, next);
 
-- 
2.43.0