[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241228184949.31582-10-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 10:49:41 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] s390: switch stop_machine_yield() to using cpumask_next_wrap()
Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU equal to wrapping CPU
effectively means the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.
cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/processor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index 42ca61909030..745649ad9779 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void notrace stop_machine_yield(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (__this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_relax_retry) >= spin_retry) {
__this_cpu_write(cpu_relax_retry, 0);
- cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(this_cpu, cpumask, this_cpu, false);
+ cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(this_cpu, cpumask);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return;
if (arch_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu))
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists