linux-kernel - [GIT PULL] locking fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z3EMXCBIoAYGn8kv@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:46:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL] locking fix

Linus,

Please pull the latest locking/urgent Git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking-urgent-2024-12-29

   # HEAD: 4a077914578183ec397ad09f7156a357e00e5d72 locking/rtmutex: Make sure we wake anything on the wake_q when we release the lock->wait_lock

Fix missed rtmutex wakeups causing sporadic boot hangs
and other misbehavior.

 Thanks,

	Ingo

------------------>
John Stultz (1):
      locking/rtmutex: Make sure we wake anything on the wake_q when we release the lock->wait_lock


 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c     | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index e858de203eb6..697a56d3d949 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1292,7 +1292,13 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	 */
 	get_task_struct(owner);
 
+	preempt_disable();
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	/* wake up any tasks on the wake_q before calling rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain */
+	wake_up_q(wake_q);
+	wake_q_init(wake_q);
+	preempt_enable();
+
 
 	res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock,
 					 next_lock, waiter, task);
@@ -1596,6 +1602,7 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
  *			 or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
  * @timeout:		 the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none
  * @waiter:		 the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @wake_q:		 wake_q of tasks to wake when we drop the lock->wait_lock
  *
  * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled
  */
@@ -1603,7 +1610,8 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 					   struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
 					   unsigned int state,
 					   struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
-					   struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+					   struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+					   struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
 	__releases(&lock->wait_lock) __acquires(&lock->wait_lock)
 {
 	struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex);
@@ -1634,7 +1642,13 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 			owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
 		else
 			owner = NULL;
+		preempt_disable();
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+		if (wake_q) {
+			wake_up_q(wake_q);
+			wake_q_init(wake_q);
+		}
+		preempt_enable();
 
 		if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, waiter, owner))
 			rt_mutex_schedule();
@@ -1708,7 +1722,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 
 	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk, wake_q);
 	if (likely(!ret))
-		ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter);
+		ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter, wake_q);
 
 	if (likely(!ret)) {
 		/* acquired the lock */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index 33ea31d6a7b3..191e4720e546 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 	/* sleep on the mutex */
 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, NULL, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
+	ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, NULL, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter, NULL);
 	/*
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
 	 * have to fix that up.