linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix raw_local_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86frm5p06l.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:09:38 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Tomas Krcka <tomas.krcka@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	nh-open-source@...zon.com,
	Tomas
 Krcka <krckatom@...zon.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Hagar
 Hemdan <hagarhem@...zon.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:21:38 +0000,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 14:28 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > 
> > Two problems here:
> > 
> > - there is no "From Tomas Krcka <krckatom@...zon.de>" at the beginning
> >   of the patch, which is needed since you are posting from a gmail.com
> >   address
> > 
> > - there is no SoB using your gmail.com address, which is needed since
> >   this patch appears to be from your Amazon doppelganger.
> 
> The latter isn't needed if you have the former, surely?

I don't see why we shouldn't have it. AFAIC, this is a different
sender, and I'm pretty sure tglx applies the same policy.

> I've lost count of the number of patches I've posted over the decades
> from my function non-corporate email address, just using a From: and
> Signed-off-by: in the body for my work address. We've always accepted
> that, and git-am does the right thing (discarding the actual From:
> address from the headers of the email).

Is that the royal 'We'?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.