linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] media: mediatek: add MT8188 AIE driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <996761d73771c010732a3b3187829a2a7a1e9903.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:13:47 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "mchehab@...nel.org"
	<mchehab@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>, Bo Kong (孔波)
	<Bo.Kong@...iatek.com>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>, "AngeloGioacchino Del
 Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
	<matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] media: mediatek: add MT8188 AIE driver

On Tue, 2024-12-31 at 09:07 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 31/12/2024 08:57, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Why clear output buffer?
> > > > Could you point out which place in the output buffer that hardware does not write data into but software would read it?
> > > > 
> > > Please respond with one email doing review, not 10 per each comment.
> > 
> > Sorry to bother you.
> > I would try to respond in one email.
> > Even though I have new comment when second review, I would not respond so frequently.
> 
> 
> Second review? You sent 11 emails, so 11 reviews?

No, the 11 review would be 1 review in one email.
But this is a big patch, maybe weeks later, I have time and review it second time.

Regards,
CK

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof