[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6pn3qjxotdtpzucpul24yro7ppddezwuizneovqvmgdwyv2j7p@ztg4mqyiqmjf>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 09:23:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev, heiko@...ech.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org, hjc@...k-chips.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, detlev.casanova@...labora.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, cl@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add rk3576 support
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 06:49:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> At 2024-12-29 18:13:39, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 08:21:48PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> >> From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> Add vop found on rk3576, the main difference between rk3576 and the
> >> previous vop is that each VP has its own interrupt line.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - describe constraint SOC by SOC, as interrupts of rk3576 is very
> >> different from others
> >> - Drop Krzysztof's Reviewed-by, as this version changed a lot.
> >>
> >> Changes in v1:
> >> - ordered by soc name
> >> - Add description for newly added interrupt
> >>
> >> .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
> >> index 2531726af306..f28cea4a6d82 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
> >> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
> >> enum:
> >> - rockchip,rk3566-vop
> >> - rockchip,rk3568-vop
> >> + - rockchip,rk3576-vop
> >> - rockchip,rk3588-vop
> >>
> >> reg:
> >> @@ -37,10 +38,22 @@ properties:
> >> - const: gamma-lut
> >>
> >> interrupts:
> >> - maxItems: 1
> >> - description:
> >> - The VOP interrupt is shared by several interrupt sources, such as
> >> - frame start (VSYNC), line flag and other status interrupts.
> >> + minItems: 1
> >> + maxItems: 4
> >> + items:
> >> + - description:
> >
> >That's contradictory. min/max say 1-4, but here you list two interrupts.
>
> There are 4 interrupts on rk3576, and the other SOC only have one.
But you listed two interrupts, so where does the "two" come from?
> I am sorry that I am not familiar with this schema language; I have read many
> other YAML bindings these days and try to write it correctly.
>
> Maybe I should not list the interrupts-names here(then list the interrupt-name by soc at allOf: part),
> like the clocks handles in samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml ?
xxx-names are supposed to be fully synced with xxx, so something needs
to be fixed here. You can of course remove interrupt-names *completely*
(but not partially, because all properties must be defined in top-level).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists