[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241231092358.GAZ3O4LroNtlnztneC@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 10:23:58 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/ghes: Make ghes_panic_timeout adjustable as a
parameter
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 02:44:48PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> + /* If user hasn't specifically set panic timeout, reboot to log the error! */
> + if (!panic_timeout && !strstr(saved_command_line, "panic="))
And you want to scan saved_command_line because?
Hint: look at how other code checks panic_timeout.
> Or we want to stick the orignal patch, which doesn't change the
> original flow?
And pile more broken stuff ontop?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists