linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Device managed platform_profile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <q45nl5wdout46frnjbkufvi2pmyhz3cfyp72qyqrsnhpnlmhue@3no6u65stho2>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 10:53:29 -0500
From: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, W_Armin@....de, 
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mario.limonciello@....com, 
	Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, soyer@....hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Device managed platform_profile_register()

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 08:31:28PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Kurt Borja wrote:
> 
> > Hi :)
> > 
> > This is meant to be merged on the pdx86 tree.
> > 
> > ~ Kurt
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Replaced convoluted cast with intermediate variable (1/2)
> >  - Restored dropped empty line (1/2)
> >  - Couldn't incorporate Armin's second comment. I probably didn't
> >    understand it (1/2)
> > v1: 
> >  - https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20241221070817.3764-2-kuurtb@gmail.com
> > 
> > Kurt Borja (2):
> >   ACPI: platform_profile: Add devm_platform_profile_register()
> >   alienware-wmi: Use devm_platform_profile_register()
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c           | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/platform/x86/dell/alienware-wmi.c | 10 +-------
> >  include/linux/platform_profile.h          |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks. I've now applied these.
> 
> The first patch is already in the for-next branch and the second is 
> currently in the review-ilpo-next branch (as I wanted to retain ability to 
> easily separate changes into platform_profile.c from the rest, they go to 
> their own branch first).

Thanks Ilpo!

Should I rebase the alienware-wmi rework patch series on top of
review-ilpo-next in v3? Currently it's on top of for-next branch.

~ Kurt

> 
> -- 
>  i.
>