linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.1.120

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241231-talisman-drone-77262b2af4a9@spud>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 18:41:27 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Z qiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, lwn@....net,
	jslaby@...e.cz, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.1.120

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> > > > > For v6.1.x kernels, the cblist_init_generic() is invoke in init task context,
> > > > > rtp->rtpcp_array is allocated use GFP_KERENL and in the critical section
> > > > > holding rcu_tasks.cbs_gbl_lock spinlock.  so might_resched() trigger warnings.
> > > > > You should perform the operation of allocating rtpcp_array memory outside
> > > > > the spinlock.
> > > > > Are you willing to resend the patch?
> > > > 
> > > > So should I revert this, or do you have a fixup patch somewhere?
> > > 
> > > Is it too soon to push for a revert? It's interfering with my CIs
> > > attempts to test the 121-rc.
> > 
> > Sure, can someone send me a revert?
> 
> Nevermind, I will just do it...

 That'd be great, at least from where I'm sitting, since I'm still AFK
 for Christmas :)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)