linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250102-daffy-vanilla-boar-6e1a61@leitao>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:15:33 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving
 schedule_work outside lock

On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 05:06:55PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:33:31PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > The growth check should stay with the atomic_inc.  Something like
> > this should work:
> 
> OK I've applied your patch with the atomic_inc move.

Sorry, I was on vacation, and I am back now. Let me know if you need
anything further.

Thanks for fixing it,
--breno