linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek,mt6779-keypad: add more compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa2033e4-0cb5-47cb-bbe7-cbcdb9318c54@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 13:52:57 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>
Cc: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
 Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>,
 Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>,
 Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek,mt6779-keypad: add more
 compatibles

Il 27/12/24 10:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:26:19PM -0300, Val Packett wrote:
>> Add compatibles for SoCs using this device (mt8183, mt8365, mt8516).
> 
> This we see from the diff. Say what is less visible, e.g. are they fully
> compatible with other variants? Partially?
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 

Yeah saying that they are fully compatible would be good here, but anyway
the change is self-explanatory (just IMO - but I know MTK SoCs so stuff appears
obvious to me from time to time, and might not be obvious for others).

Anyway, input maintainers, please let me know if you want to take this (or the
next version) through the input tree or if I should take it in the MediaTek tree
along with the devicetree changes.

Cheers,
Angelo

> ---
> 
> <form letter>
> This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
> are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
> not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>