[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3bYMiOG0u3Jtv3h@smc-140338-bm01>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:17:22 +0000
From: Fan Ni <nifan.cxl@...il.com>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] libnvdimm: Replace namespace_match() with
device_find_child_by_name()
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 08:08:03AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>
> Simplify nd_namespace_store() implementation by
> using device_find_child_by_name().
>
> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/claim.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c b/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> index 030dbde6b0882050c90fb8db106ec15b1baef7ca..9e84ab411564f9d5e7ceb687c6491562564552e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> @@ -67,13 +67,6 @@ bool nd_attach_ndns(struct device *dev, struct nd_namespace_common *attach,
> return claimed;
> }
>
> -static int namespace_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
> -{
> - char *name = data;
> -
> - return strcmp(name, dev_name(dev)) == 0;
> -}
> -
> static bool is_idle(struct device *dev, struct nd_namespace_common *ndns)
> {
> struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(dev->parent);
> @@ -168,7 +161,7 @@ ssize_t nd_namespace_store(struct device *dev,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - found = device_find_child(dev->parent, name, namespace_match);
> + found = device_find_child_by_name(dev->parent, name);
Looks good to me.
Just one general question.
The function device_find_child checks parent and parent->p, but
device_find_child_by_name only checks parent although they share the
code except the match function. Why that?
Fan
> if (!found) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "'%s' not found under %s\n", name,
> dev_name(dev->parent));
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Fan Ni (From gmail)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists