linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] soc: loongson: add Loongson Security Module driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad63f9ab-90cb-abe7-8099-2666e9a65a56@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 16:35:39 +0800
From: Zhao Qunqin <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.cn>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net, soc@...nel.org, soc@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, xry111@...111.site,
 christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] soc: loongson: add Loongson Security Module
 driver


在 2025/1/3 下午3:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 03/01/2025 03:25, Zhao Qunqin wrote:
>> 在 2024/12/28 下午7:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>>> Only ACPI firmware is supported.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.cn>
>>> I don't get why you are sending this to soc. This is loongson specific
>>> and is supposed to go via Loongson maintainers.
>>>
>>> And why is this a resend?
>> There are no platform-specific maintainers, So I initially sent the
>> patch to Arnd,
> What do you mean by "no platform-specific maintainers"? This
> architecture and this platform is abandoned?

Sorry for my poor english. This architecture and this  platform is not 
ababdoned.

What I mean is that there are no Loongson staff to maintain 
drivers/soc/loongson.

The current maintainer  for drivers/soc/loongson is Arnd.


Thanks for your response.

> Then we should either drop it from the kernel or make it orphaned.
>
>
>> but didn't receive a response from Arnold, so I resent the patch and added
>>
>> soc@...nel.org to the mailing list.
> You shouldn't. This is patch for your maintainers to take. If you do not
> have them: either fix that or abandon/orphan the platform.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof