[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nascjndmcy3dhgb53p3i4khffljxtsigxvkw74dw4x27twre5p@n5bydi6oiahg>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 15:44:41 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] jbd2: Correct stale comment of release_buffer_page
On Wed 25-12-24 04:27:07, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Update stale lock info in comment of release_buffer_page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/jbd2/commit.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
> index 9153ff3a08e7..d812d15f295e 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static void journal_end_buffer_io_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
> * So here, we have a buffer which has just come off the forget list. Look to
> * see if we can strip all buffers from the backing page.
> *
> - * Called under lock_journal(), and possibly under journal_datalist_lock. The
> - * caller provided us with a ref against the buffer, and we drop that here.
> + * Called under j_list_lock. The caller provided us with a ref against the
> + * buffer, and we drop that here.
> */
> static void release_buffer_page(struct buffer_head *bh)
> {
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists