[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29fffca1.18a8.1942a1e9aa0.Coremail.zhangdongdong@eswincomputing.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:03:56 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: DongdongZhang <zhangdongdong@...incomputing.com>
To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, yishaih@...dia.com, avihaih@...dia.com,
yi.l.liu@...el.com, ankita@...dia.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Remove redundant macro
Hi Alex,
Thank you for the review and for providing your Acked-by!
I agree that this patch primarily involves PCI changes,
including a modification to PCI UAPI. Therefore, I believe
it would make the most sense to have it go through the PCI tree.
Please let me know if there are any additional steps I
should take to ensure a smooth submission.
Thanks again for your time and support!
Best regards,
Dongdong Zhang
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> 发送时间:2025-01-03 07:50:04 (星期五)
> 收件人: zhangdongdong@...incomputing.com
> 抄送: bhelgaas@...gle.com, yishaih@...dia.com, avihaih@...dia.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, ankita@...dia.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
> 主题: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Remove redundant macro
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:35:36 +0800
> zhangdongdong@...incomputing.com wrote:
>
> > From: Dongdong Zhang <zhangdongdong@...incomputing.com>
> >
> > Removed the duplicate macro `PCI_VSEC_HDR` and its related macro
> > `PCI_VSEC_HDR_LEN_SHIFT` from `pci_regs.h` to avoid redundancy and
> > inconsistencies. Updated VFIO PCI code to use `PCI_VNDR_HEADER` and
> > `PCI_VNDR_HEADER_LEN()` for consistent naming and functionality.
> >
> > These changes aim to streamline header handling while minimizing
> > impact, given the niche usage of these macros in userspace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dongdong Zhang <zhangdongdong@...incomputing.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 5 +++--
>
> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
>
> Let me know if this is expected to go through the vfio tree. Given
> that vfio is just collateral to a PCI change and it's touching PCI
> uapi, I'm assuming it'll go through the PCI tree. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 3 ---
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> > index ea2745c1ac5e..5572fd99b921 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> > @@ -1389,11 +1389,12 @@ static int vfio_ext_cap_len(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u16 ecap, u16 epo
> >
> > switch (ecap) {
> > case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VNDR:
> > - ret = pci_read_config_dword(pdev, epos + PCI_VSEC_HDR, &dword);
> > + ret = pci_read_config_dword(pdev, epos + PCI_VNDR_HEADER,
> > + &dword);
> > if (ret)
> > return pcibios_err_to_errno(ret);
> >
> > - return dword >> PCI_VSEC_HDR_LEN_SHIFT;
> > + return PCI_VNDR_HEADER_LEN(dword);
> > case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VC:
> > case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VC9:
> > case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MFVC:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > index 1601c7ed5fab..bcd44c7ca048 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > @@ -1001,9 +1001,6 @@
> > #define PCI_ACS_CTRL 0x06 /* ACS Control Register */
> > #define PCI_ACS_EGRESS_CTL_V 0x08 /* ACS Egress Control Vector */
> >
> > -#define PCI_VSEC_HDR 4 /* extended cap - vendor-specific */
> > -#define PCI_VSEC_HDR_LEN_SHIFT 20 /* shift for length field */
> > -
> > /* SATA capability */
> > #define PCI_SATA_REGS 4 /* SATA REGs specifier */
> > #define PCI_SATA_REGS_MASK 0xF /* location - BAR#/inline */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists