[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd95948c7c1936269d6b98ae290cd0fae0af2923.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 13:27:41 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nadav.amit@...il.com,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] x86/mm: add X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB definition.
On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 13:04 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:53:04PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@
> > #define X86_FEATURE_CLZERO (13*32+ 0) /* "clzero"
> > CLZERO instruction */
> > #define X86_FEATURE_IRPERF (13*32+ 1) /* "irperf"
> > Instructions Retired Count */
> > #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEERPTR (13*32+ 2) /* "xsaveerptr"
> > Always save/restore FP error pointers */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB (13*32+ 3) /* "invlpgb"
> > INVLPGB instruction */
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> We don't show random CPUID bits in /proc/cpuinfo anymore so you can
> remove
> that.
I still see dozens of flags in /proc/cpuinfo here on
6.11. When did that change?
>
> > #define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU (13*32+ 4) /* "rdpru" Read
> > processor register at user level */
> > #define X86_FEATURE_WBNOINVD (13*32+ 9) /* "wbnoinvd"
> > WBNOINVD instruction */
> > #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB (13*32+12) /* Indirect
> > Branch Prediction Barrier */
> > --
>
> Also, merge this patch with the patch which uses the flag pls.
The first real use is 3 patches further down into the
series.
I'm not convinced things will be more readable if 4
patches get squashed down into one.
Are you sure you want that?
--
All Rights Reversed.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists