[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250104090009.331193-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 10:00:09 +0100
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: idle: small CPU iteration refactoring
Replace the loop to check if all SMT CPUs are idle with
cpumask_subset(). This simplifies the code and slightly improves
efficiency, while preserving the original behavior.
Note that idle_masks.smt handling remains racy, which is acceptable as
it serves as an optimization and is self-correcting.
Suggested-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 926579624c41..0ce116e0f67c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3671,10 +3671,8 @@ void __scx_update_idle(struct rq *rq, bool idle)
* idle_masks.smt handling is racy but that's fine as
* it's only for optimization and self-correcting.
*/
- for_each_cpu(cpu, smt) {
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, idle_masks.cpu))
- return;
- }
+ if (!cpumask_subset(smt, idle_masks.cpu))
+ return;
cpumask_or(idle_masks.smt, idle_masks.smt, smt);
} else {
cpumask_andnot(idle_masks.smt, idle_masks.smt, smt);
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists