[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250104110955.GA2394@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 12:09:56 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Provide __free(argv) for argv_split() users
On 01/04, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>
> +DEFINE_FREE(argv, char **, argv_free(_T))
This doesn't look right, I think we need
DEFINE_FREE(argv, char **, if (_T) argv_free(_T))
?
>From the next patch
@@ -73,24 +73,20 @@ int dyn_event_release(const char *raw_command, struct dyn_event_operations *type
struct dyn_event *pos, *n;
char *system = NULL, *event, *p;
int argc, ret = -ENOENT;
- char **argv;
+ char **argv __free(argv) = NULL;
argv = argv_split(GFP_KERNEL, raw_command, &argc);
if (!argv)
return -ENOMEM;
if argv_split() returns NULL, then __free_argv() will call argv_free(NULL) ?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists