[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <707925ce-b76e-470a-921f-7ac165a04d69@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:21:29 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>, aaro.koskinen@....fi,
andreas@...nade.info, khilman@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: m-leonard@...com, praneeth@...com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: tps65215: Add TPS65215 to platform_device_id
table
On 04/01/2025 00:54, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> Add platform_device_id struct and use the platform_get_device_id() output
> to match which PMIC device is in use. With new name options, the gpio_chip
> .label field is now assigned to the platform_device name match.
>
> Remove MODULE_ALIAS since it is now generated by MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
> index 526640c39a11..7e03be0c7c92 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> - * GPIO driver for TI TPS65219 PMICs
> + * GPIO driver for TI TPS65215/TPS65219 PMICs
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> */
>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ static int tps65219_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off
> }
>
> static const struct gpio_chip tps65219_template_chip = {
> - .label = "tps65219-gpio",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .get_direction = tps65219_gpio_get_direction,
> .direction_input = tps65219_gpio_direction_input,
> @@ -164,20 +163,28 @@ static int tps65219_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> gpio->tps = tps;
> gpio->gpio_chip = tps65219_template_chip;
> + gpio->gpio_chip.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> gpio->gpio_chip.parent = tps->dev;
>
> return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gpio_chip, gpio);
> }
>
> +static const struct platform_device_id tps6521x_gpio_id_table[] = {
> + { "tps65215-gpio", TPS65215 },
> + { "tps65219-gpio", TPS65219 },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, tps6521x_gpio_id_table);
> +
> static struct platform_driver tps65219_gpio_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "tps65219-gpio",
> },
> .probe = tps65219_gpio_probe,
> + .id_table = tps6521x_gpio_id_table,
> };
> module_platform_driver(tps65219_gpio_driver);
>
> -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:tps65219-gpio");
Why do you drop the MODULE_ALIAS?
You can add multiple MODULE_ALIASES if needed.
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS65219 GPIO driver");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS65215/TPS65219 GPIO driver");
"TPS6521x GPIO driver"?
I also see a product named TPS65216.
By any chance can that be also supported by this driver?
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists