[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250106044120.GB14389@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:41:20 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for
pinctrl
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 06:16:12PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 03:28:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:20:45PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>> >
>> > pinctrl-scmi.c and pinctrl-imx-scmi.c, both use SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL.
>> > If both drivers are built in, and the scmi device with name "pinctrl-imx"
>> > is created earlier, and the fwnode device points to the scmi device,
>> > non-i.MX platforms will never have the pinctrl supplier ready.
>> >
>>
>> I wonder if we can prevent creation of "pinctrl-imx" scmi device on non
>> i.MX platforms instead of this hack which IMO is little less hackier
>> (and little more cleaner as we don't create problem and then fix here)
>> than this change.
>
>...or indeed this is another possibility
I am doing a patch as below, how to do you think?
With below patch, we could resolve the devlink issue and also support mutitple
vendor drivers built in, with each vendor driver has a machine_allowlist.
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
index 1d2aedfcfdb4..c1c45b545480 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
@@ -55,6 +55,20 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
unsigned int id = 0;
struct list_head *head, *phead = NULL;
struct scmi_requested_dev *rdev;
+ const char * const *allowlist = id_table->machine_allowlist;
+ const char * const *blocklist = id_table->machine_blocklist;
+
+ if (blocklist && of_machine_compatible_match(blocklist)) {
+ pr_debug("block SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
+ id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (allowlist && !of_machine_compatible_match(allowlist)) {
+ pr_debug("block SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
+ id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id);
+ return 0;
+ }
pr_debug("Requesting SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id);
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 688466a0e816..e1b822d3522f 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -950,6 +950,9 @@ struct scmi_device {
struct scmi_device_id {
u8 protocol_id;
const char *name;
+ /* Optional */
+ const char * const *machine_blocklist;
+ const char * const *machine_allowlist;
};
struct scmi_driver {
Thanks,
Peng
>
>Thanks,
>Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists