[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eddc0ba3-1023-4bad-88df-de17c28877e4@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:30:27 -0600
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Shree Ramamoorthy
<s-ramamoorthy@...com>, <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
<andreas@...nade.info>, <khilman@...libre.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <brgl@...ev.pl>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <m-leonard@...com>, <praneeth@...com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio: tps65215: Add TPS65215 to platform_device_id
table
On 1/4/25 12:21 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>
> On 04/01/2025 00:54, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
>> Add platform_device_id struct and use the platform_get_device_id() output
>> to match which PMIC device is in use. With new name options, the gpio_chip
>> .label field is now assigned to the platform_device name match.
>>
>> Remove MODULE_ALIAS since it is now generated by MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
>> index 526640c39a11..7e03be0c7c92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c
>> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> /*
>> - * GPIO driver for TI TPS65219 PMICs
>> + * GPIO driver for TI TPS65215/TPS65219 PMICs
>> *
>> - * Copyright (C) 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ static int tps65219_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off
>> }
>>
>> static const struct gpio_chip tps65219_template_chip = {
>> - .label = "tps65219-gpio",
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .get_direction = tps65219_gpio_get_direction,
>> .direction_input = tps65219_gpio_direction_input,
>> @@ -164,20 +163,28 @@ static int tps65219_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> gpio->tps = tps;
>> gpio->gpio_chip = tps65219_template_chip;
>> + gpio->gpio_chip.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
>> gpio->gpio_chip.parent = tps->dev;
>>
>> return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gpio_chip, gpio);
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct platform_device_id tps6521x_gpio_id_table[] = {
>> + { "tps65215-gpio", TPS65215 },
>> + { "tps65219-gpio", TPS65219 },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, tps6521x_gpio_id_table);
>> +
>> static struct platform_driver tps65219_gpio_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "tps65219-gpio",
>> },
>> .probe = tps65219_gpio_probe,
>> + .id_table = tps6521x_gpio_id_table,
>> };
>> module_platform_driver(tps65219_gpio_driver);
>>
>> -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:tps65219-gpio");
>
> Why do you drop the MODULE_ALIAS?
> You can add multiple MODULE_ALIASES if needed.
>
The new MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() above causes all the needed
module aliases to be made for us automatically.
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>");
>> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS65219 GPIO driver");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS65215/TPS65219 GPIO driver");
>
> "TPS6521x GPIO driver"?
>
> I also see a product named TPS65216.
> By any chance can that be also supported by this driver?
>
That is kinda the issue with "x" in the name, TPS65216 might
need a different driver, in which case the x here would mislead
folks into thinking this driver covers the whole family.
Andrew
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists