lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250106152107.2c0fc03c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:21:07 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Greg KH
 <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing
 List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the char-misc.current
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c

between commit:

  54d394905c92 ("iio: adc: ti-ads1119: fix sample size in scan struct for triggered buffer")

from the char-misc.current tree and commit:

  2cfb4cd058d0 ("iio: adc: Use aligned_s64 instead of open coding alignment.")

from the iio tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
index c268e27eec12,0a68ecdea4e6..000000000000
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
@@@ -500,8 -500,8 +500,8 @@@ static irqreturn_t ads1119_trigger_hand
  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
  	struct ads1119_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
  	struct {
 -		unsigned int sample;
 +		s16 sample;
- 		s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
+ 		aligned_s64 timestamp;
  	} scan;
  	unsigned int index;
  	int ret;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ