linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/222] 6.6.70-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250106200453.1546073-1-ojeda@kernel.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Jan 2025 21:04:53 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	conor@...nel.org,
	f.fainelli@...il.com,
	hargar@...rosoft.com,
	jonathanh@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...nelci.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	pavel@...x.de,
	rwarsow@....de,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	srw@...dewatkins.net,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/222] 6.6.70-rc1 review

On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 16:13:24 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.70 release.
> There are 222 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

I got (in both the two runs I did):

    [    0.022989] ------------[ cut here ]------------
    [    0.023006] Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead
    [    0.023362] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/memblock.c:1325 memblock_set_node+0xcf/0xe0
    [    0.023841] Modules linked in:
    [    0.023988] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.70-rc1-g5652330123c6 #1
    [    0.024062] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
    [    0.024156] RIP: 0010:memblock_set_node+0xcf/0xe0
    [    0.024215] Code: 2c 07 48 83 c0 18 48 ff c9 75 f0 48 89 df e8 78 01 00 00 31 c0 eb a8 c6 05 a7 24 a6 ff 01 48 c7 c7 1e 37 7b a7 e8 71 aa 07 fe <0f> 0b e9 67 ff ff ff e8 75 f3 e3 fe 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 41 57 41 56
    [    0.024361] RSP: 0000:ffffffffa7a03eb0 EFLAGS: 00000046 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
    [    0.024386] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffa82a2240 RCX: ffffffffa7a52068
    [    0.024397] RDX: ffffffffa7a03daf RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffffffffa7a52060
    [    0.024407] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffffa7a52240 R09: 4f4e5f414d554e20
    [    0.024417] R10: 2045444f4e5f4f4e R11: 0a64616574736e69 R12: 0000000000000040
    [    0.024428] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 0000000000000000
    [    0.024465] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffffa81a4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    [    0.024490] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    [    0.024502] CR2: ffff8c88c6001000 CR3: 0000000005628000 CR4: 00000000000000b0
    [    0.024585] Call Trace:
    [    0.024778]  <TASK>
    [    0.024953]  ? __warn+0xc3/0x1c0
    [    0.025012]  ? memblock_set_node+0xcf/0xe0
    [    0.025024]  ? report_bug+0x144/0x1e0
    [    0.025042]  ? early_fixup_exception+0x46/0x90
    [    0.025051]  ? early_idt_handler_common+0x2f/0x40
    [    0.025065]  ? memblock_set_node+0xcf/0xe0
    [    0.025074]  ? acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init+0x80/0x80
    [    0.025084]  ? numa_init+0x5e/0x190
    [    0.025091]  ? x86_numa_init+0x15/0x40
    [    0.025099]  ? setup_arch+0x4a3/0x5a0
    [    0.025105]  ? start_kernel+0x5a/0x3a0
    [    0.025115]  ? x86_64_start_reservations+0x20/0x20
    [    0.025122]  ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xa7/0xb0
    [    0.025128]  ? secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x179/0x17b
    [    0.025156]  </TASK>
    [    0.025196] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

I hope the helps!

Cheers,
Miguel