[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7686593-ab07-4e18-912d-745576c6a450@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:41:13 +0200
From: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: usi: replace USI_V2 in
constants with USI_MODE
On 1/6/25 09:36, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> On 1/5/25 4:03 PM, Ivaylo Ivanov wrote:
>> +#define USI_MODE_NONE 0
>> +#define USI_MODE_UART 1
>> +#define USI_MODE_SPI 2
>> +#define USI_MODE_I2C 3
> USI_CONFIG register refers to the protocol selection with USI_I2C,
> USI_SPI, USI_UART. How about getting rid of the MODE from the name?
I thought about that too but I believe that mentioning that these constants
are for mode selection in their name is generally a good practice. Let me know
if dropping _MODE is really needed.
Best regards,
Ivaylo
>
> Cheers,
> ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists