linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] drivers:gpio: introduce variants of gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8e3ad94-1a43-4439-91d9-15ad91aaea9b@189.cn>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 17:11:28 +0800
From: Song Chen <chensong_2000@....cn>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] drivers:gpio: introduce variants of gpiod_get_array

Hi Bart,

在 2025/1/4 04:41, Bartosz Golaszewski 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 2:25 AM Song Chen <chensong_2000@....cn> wrote:
>>
>> Dear maintainers,
>>
>> It has been a while after this patch was sent. I'm not sure if i
>> followed the idea suggested by Bart correctly, see [1], any comment will
>> be appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Song
>>
>> [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMRc=MfpwuMh-MH1UEHKky09iAs4g9=iGFPptARXzoZrVS8hdQ@mail.gmail.com/
>>
> 
> I've been meaning to respond and it fell off my radar. We typically
> don't add new calls without users so I'd love to see this patch in
> conjunction with a conversion of some driver to using it in order to
> prove that the change makes sense
> 
> Bart
> 

yes, agree, i planned to send a patchset with this one and s5m8767 
together, but i had a question and haven't got any response from 
Krzysztof yet. Maybe i was off his radar as well.

I will send another mail to see how he thinks, you are in that thread, 
please join the discussion.

Many thanks

Song