[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1de887c-6193-48ee-a9b3-04c8a0cdda45@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 18:55:58 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, kevin.brodsky@....com, palmer@...belt.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, david@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
vbabka@...nel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, will@...nel.org,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, npiggin@...il.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
rppt@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] mm: pgtable: introduce pagetable_dtor()
On 2025/1/6 18:34, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 05:07:42PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> The pagetable_p*_dtor() are exactly the same except for the handling of
>> ptlock. If we make ptlock_free() handle the case where ptdesc->ptl is
>> NULL and remove VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() from pmd_ptlock_free(), we can unify
>> pagetable_p*_dtor() into one function. Let's introduce pagetable_dtor()
>> to do this.
>>
>> Later, pagetable_dtor() will be moved to tlb_remove_ptdesc(), so that
>> ptlock and page table pages can be freed together (regardless of whether
>> RCU is used). This prevents the use-after-free problem where the ptlock
>> is freed immediately but the page table pages is freed later via RCU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
>> Originally-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index 5d82f42ddd5cc..cad11fa10c192 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,15 @@ static inline bool ptlock_init(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { return true; }
>> static inline void ptlock_free(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) {}
>> #endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */
>>
>> +static inline void pagetable_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>> +{
>> + struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc);
>> +
>> + ptlock_free(ptdesc);
>> + __folio_clear_pgtable(folio);
>> + lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE);
>> +}
>> +
>
> If I am not mistaken, it is just pagetable_pte_dtor() rename.
> What is the point in moving the code around?
No, this is to unify pagetable_p*_dtor() into pagetable_dtor(), so
that we can move pagetable_dtor() to __tlb_remove_table(), and then
ptlock and PTE page can be freed together through RCU, which is
also the main purpose of this patch series.
Thanks!
>
>> static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>> {
>> struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc);
>> @@ -3003,15 +3012,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>> -{
>> - struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc);
>> -
>> - ptlock_free(ptdesc);
>> - __folio_clear_pgtable(folio);
>> - lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE);
>> -}
>> -
>> pte_t *___pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp);
>> static inline pte_t *__pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>> pmd_t *pmdvalp)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists