[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3vIBq1eTxJcDOyc@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:09:42 +0100
From: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
Cc: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
"airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
"simona@...ll.ch" <simona@...ll.ch>,
"Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@....com>, "Ma, Le" <Le.Ma@....com>,
"hamza.mahfooz@....com" <hamza.mahfooz@....com>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"Liu, Shaoyun" <Shaoyun.Liu@....com>,
"Jun.Ma2@....com" <Jun.Ma2@....com>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com" <tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: AW: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Enable runtime modification of
gpu_recovery parameter with validation
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:21:43AM +0000, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
>
> Hi Shuai,
>
> setting gpu_recovery=0 is not even remotely related to RAS. If that
> option affects RAS behavior in any way then that is a bug.
>
> The purpose of setting gpu_recovery=0 is to disable resets after a
> submission timeout most likely caused by an unrecoverable HW error.
>
> This is necessary for JTAG debugging in our labs during HW bringup and
> should *NEVER* be used on any production system.
>
> We already discussed with upstream maintainers that we should probably
> mark the kernel as tainted to indicate that it might be in an unreliable
> HW state. I will push for this now since there seems to be a big
> misunderstanding what this option does.
module_param_unsafe and friends really should be the default for module
options really, since generally they're just for debugging and other
hacks. With multiple gpus you can't control options per-device with module
options in a reasonable way, so that's all no-go. So might want to go
large-scale relabelling module options while you're at it.
-Sima
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Dezember 2024 09:50
> An: Koenig, Christian; Deucher, Alexander; Pan, Xinhui; airlied@...il.com; simona@...ll.ch; Lazar, Lijo; Ma, Le; hamza.mahfooz@....com; tzimmermann@...e.de; Liu, Shaoyun; Jun.Ma2@....com
> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Enable runtime modification of gpu_recovery parameter with validation
>
>
>
> 在 2024/12/30 04:11, Christian König 写道:
> > Am 28.12.24 um 07:32 schrieb Shuai Xue:
> >> It's observed that most GPU jobs utilize less than one server, typically
> >> with each GPU being used by an independent job. If a job consumed poisoned
> >> data, a SIGBUS signal will be sent to terminate it. Meanwhile, the
> >> gpu_recovery parameter is set to -1 by default, the amdgpu driver resets
> >> all GPUs on the server. As a result, all jobs are terminated. Setting
> >> gpu_recovery to 0 provides an opportunity to preemptively evacuate other
> >> jobs and subsequently manually reset all GPUs.
> >
> > *BIG* NAK to this whole approach!
> >
> > Setting gpu_recovery to 0 in a production environment is *NOT* supported at all and should never be done.
> >
> > This is a pure debugging feature for JTAG debugging and can result in random crashes and/or compromised data.
> >
> > Please don't tell me that you tried to use this in a production environment.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian.
>
> Hi, Christian,
>
> Thank you for your quick reply.
>
> When an application encounters uncorrected error, it will be terminate by a
> SIGBUS signal. The related bad pages are retired. I did not figure why
> gpu_recovery=0 can result in random crashes and/or compromised data.
>
> I test with error injection in my dev enviroment:
>
> 1. load driver with gpu_recovery=0
> #cat /sys/bus/pci/drivers/amdgpu/module/parameters/gpu_recovery
> 0
>
> 2. inject a Uncorrectable ECC error to UMC
> #sudo amdgpuras -d 0 -b 2 -t 8
> Poison inject, logical addr:0x7f2b495f9000 physical addr:0x27f5d4b000 vmid:5
> Bus error
>
> 3. GPU 0000:0a:00.0 reports error address with PA
> #dmesg | grep 27f5
> [424443.174154] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5d43080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x0 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174156] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5d4b080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x4 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174158] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5d53080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x8 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174160] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5d5b080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0xc Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174162] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5f43080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x10 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174169] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5f4b080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x14 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174172] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5f53080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x18 Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
> [424443.174174] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Error Address(PA):0x27f5f5b080 Row:0x1fd7 Col:0x1c Bank:0xa Channel:0x30
>
> 4. All the related bad pages are AMDGPU_RAS_RETIRE_PAGE_RESERVED.
> #cat /sys/devices/pci0000:05/0000:05:01.0/0000:06:00.0/0000:07:00.0/0000:08:00.0/0000:09:00.0/0000:0a:00.0/ras/gpu_vram_bad_pages | grep 27f5
> 0x027f5d43 : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5d4b : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5d53 : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5d5b : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5f43 : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5f4b : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5f53 : 0x00001000 : R
> 0x027f5f5b : 0x00001000 : R
>
> AFAIK, the reserved bad pages will not be used any more. Please correct me if
> I missed anything.
>
> DRAM ECC issues are the most common problems. When it occurs, the kernel will
> attempt to hard-offline the page, by trying to unmap the page or killing any
> owner, or triggering IO errors if needed.
>
> ECC error is also common for HBM and error isolation from each user's job is a
> basic requirement in public cloud. For NVIDIA GPU, a ECC error could be
> contained to a process.
>
> > XID 94: Contained ECC error
> > XID 95: UnContained ECC error
> >
> > For Xid 94, these errors are contained to one application, and the application
> > that encountered this error must be restarted. All other applications running
> > at the time of the Xid are unaffected. It is recommended to reset the GPU when
> > convenient. Applications can continue to be run until the reset can be
> > performed.
> >
> > For Xid 95, these errors affect multiple applications, and the affected GPU
> > must be reset before applications can restart.
> >
> > https://docs.nvidia.com/deploy/xid-errors/
>
> Does AMD GPU provide a similar way to achieve error isolation requirement?
>
> Best Regards,
> Shuai
>
> >
> >> However, this parameter is
> >> read-only, necessitating correct settings at driver load. And reloading the
> >> GPU driver in a production environment can be challenging due to reference
> >> counts maintained by various monitoring services.
> >>
> >> Set the gpu_recovery parameter with read-write permission to enable runtime
> >> modification. It will enables users to dynamically manage GPU recovery
> >> mechanisms based on real-time requirements or conditions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> >> index 38686203bea6..03dd902e1cec 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> >> @@ -563,12 +563,36 @@ module_param_named(lbpw, amdgpu_lbpw, int, 0444);
> >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(compute_multipipe, "Force compute queues to be spread across pipes (1 = enable, 0 = disable, -1 = auto)");
> >> module_param_named(compute_multipipe, amdgpu_compute_multipipe, int, 0444);
> >> +static int amdgpu_set_gpu_recovery(const char *buf,
> >> + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long val;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (val != 1 && val != 0 && val != -1) {
> >> + pr_err("Invalid value for gpu_recovery: %ld, excepted 0,1,-1\n",
> >> + val);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return param_set_int(buf, kp);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct kernel_param_ops amdgpu_gpu_recovery_ops = {
> >> + .set = amdgpu_set_gpu_recovery,
> >> + .get = param_get_int,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * DOC: gpu_recovery (int)
> >> * Set to enable GPU recovery mechanism (1 = enable, 0 = disable). The default is -1 (auto, disabled except SRIOV).
> >> */
> >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(gpu_recovery, "Enable GPU recovery mechanism, (1 = enable, 0 = disable, -1 = auto)");
> >> -module_param_named(gpu_recovery, amdgpu_gpu_recovery, int, 0444);
> >> +module_param_cb(gpu_recovery, &amdgpu_gpu_recovery_ops, &amdgpu_gpu_recovery, 0644);
> >> /**
> >> * DOC: emu_mode (int)
--
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists