[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3vOZ18jcCpHIcPD@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:36:55 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, kevin.brodsky@....com, palmer@...belt.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, david@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
hughd@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, vbabka@...nel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, will@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
npiggin@...il.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, rppt@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] mm: pgtable: introduce pagetable_dtor()
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:55:58PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > > +static inline void pagetable_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc);
> > > +
> > > + ptlock_free(ptdesc);
> > > + __folio_clear_pgtable(folio);
> > > + lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE);
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > If I am not mistaken, it is just pagetable_pte_dtor() rename.
> > What is the point in moving the code around?
>
> No, this is to unify pagetable_p*_dtor() into pagetable_dtor(), so
> that we can move pagetable_dtor() to __tlb_remove_table(), and then
> ptlock and PTE page can be freed together through RCU, which is
> also the main purpose of this patch series.
I am only talking about this patch. pagetable_dtor() code above is
the same pagetable_pte_dtor() below - it is only the function name
that changed. So why to move the function body? Anyway, that is
just a nit.
> Thanks!
> > > -static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
> > > -{
> > > - struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc);
> > > -
> > > - ptlock_free(ptdesc);
> > > - __folio_clear_pgtable(folio);
> > > - lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE);
> > > -}
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists