lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca9d385e-3c1f-435a-9ebd-85f7d3e72aa0@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:11:20 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
 Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/pmc: Only disable IRQ1 wakeup where
 i8042 actually enabled it

On 12/29/2024 10:43, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Wakeup for IRQ1 should be disabled only in cases where i8042 had actually
> enabled it, otherwise "wake_depth" for this IRQ will try do drop below zero
> and there will be an unpleasant WARN() logged:
> kernel: atkbd serio0: Disabling IRQ1 wakeup source to avoid platform firmware bug
> kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel: Unbalanced IRQ 1 wake disable
> kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 6431 at kernel/irq/manage.c:920 irq_set_irq_wake+0x147/0x1a0
> 
> To fix this call the PMC suspend handler only from the same set of
> dev_pm_ops handlers as i8042_pm_suspend() is called, which currently means
> just the ".suspend" handler.
> Previously, the code would use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() to define its
> dev_pm_ops, which also called this handler on ".freeze" and ".poweroff".
> 
> To reproduce this issue try hibernating (S4) the machine after a fresh boot
> without putting it into s2idle first.
> 
> Fixes: 8e60615e8932 ("platform/x86/amd: pmc: Disable IRQ1 wakeup for RN/CZN")
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>

The code change makes sense to me.  You can add this when you resubmit 
v2 for the commit message changes requested by Ilpo.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>

> ---
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc.c | 8 +++++++-
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc.c
> index 26b878ee5191..a254debb9256 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc.c
> @@ -947,6 +947,10 @@ static int amd_pmc_suspend_handler(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Must be called only from the same set of dev_pm_ops handlers
> +	 * as i8042_pm_suspend() is called: currently just from .suspend.
> +	 */
>   	if (pdev->disable_8042_wakeup && !disable_workarounds) {
>   		int rc = amd_pmc_wa_irq1(pdev);
>   
> @@ -959,7 +963,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_suspend_handler(struct device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(amd_pmc_pm, amd_pmc_suspend_handler, NULL);
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops amd_pmc_pm = {
> +	.suspend = amd_pmc_suspend_handler,
> +};
>   
>   static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
>   	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_PS) },


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ