linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/bridge: add documentation of refcounted bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250107-roaring-lush-civet-b0ba47@houat>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:12:00 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, 
	Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, 
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>, 
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, 
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Hervé Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, 
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/bridge: add documentation of refcounted
 bridges

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:35:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 03:49:48PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:39, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Most of these comments affect your earlier patches, but let's work on
> > > > the API-level view.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 11:39:58AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> 
> > > >         if (IS_ERR(priv))
> > > >            return ERR_PTR(priv);
> > > >         bridge = &priv->bridge;
> > > >
> > > >         ...
> > > >
> > > >         drm_bridge_add(bridge);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Would work just as well.
> > > >
> > > > I also don't think we need explicit (at least for the common case)
> > > > drm_bridge_get and drm_bridge_put calls for bridge users.
> > > > drm_bridge_attach and drm_bridge_detach can get/put the reference
> > > > directly.
> > > 
> > > As I wrote previously, I think drm_bridge_attach() might be too late for that.
> > > It sounds like drm_of_get_panel_or_bridge() and of_drm_find_bridge
> > > should increment the refcount, possibly adding a devres action to put
> > > the reference.
> > 
> > We probably need both. drm_bridge_attach adds the bridge pointer to the
> > encoder bridge_chain list, so if we had something like
> > 
> > bridge = drm_of_find_bridge();
> > drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge);
> > drm_bridge_put(bridge);
> > 
> > We could have a dangling pointer.
> 
> Yes... So, both drm_bridge_attach and drm_of_find_bridge() should take
> the refcount.
> 
> Just as an idea, it might be nice to add refcounting to bridges_show(),
> so that we can easily verify that refcounting works correctly.

Yep, it looks like a good idea indeed.

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)