linux-kernel - linux-next: build warnings after merge of the xilinx tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250107111117.599016eb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:11:17 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the xilinx tree

Hi all,

After merging the xilinx tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:

arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dts:55.3-13: Warning (reg_format): /axi/memory-controller@...0e000/nand-controller@0,0/nand@0:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dtb: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dtb: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dtb: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dtb: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dts:54.9-56.4: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /axi/memory-controller@...0e000/nand-controller@0,0/nand@0: Relying on default #address-cells value
arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-ebaz4205.dts:54.9-56.4: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /axi/memory-controller@...0e000/nand-controller@0,0/nand@0: Relying on default #size-cells value

Presumably introduced by commit

  dd6c610ac948 ("ARM: zynq: Do not define address/size-cells for nand-controller")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped