[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpH56vVJ5YxAAUt9pL+7s2a8RecOBiiGcZstyJan+GEAaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 10:51:14 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, mjguzik@...il.com, oliver.sang@...el.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
klarasmodin@...il.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/17] mm: uninline the main body of vma_start_write()
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 9:45 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 9:35 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/26/24 18:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > vma_start_write() is used in many places and will grow in size very soon.
> > > It is not used in performance critical paths and uninlining it should
> > > limit the future code size growth.
> > > No functional changes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >
> > > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > > @@ -6328,6 +6328,20 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_mm_and_find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> > > +void __vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int mm_lock_seq)
> > > +{
> > > + down_write(&vma->vm_lock.lock);
> > > + /*
> > > + * We should use WRITE_ONCE() here because we can have concurrent reads
> > > + * from the early lockless pessimistic check in vma_start_read().
> > > + * We don't really care about the correctness of that early check, but
> > > + * we should use WRITE_ONCE() for cleanliness and to keep KCSAN happy.
> > > + */
> > > + WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq, mm_lock_seq);
> > > + up_write(&vma->vm_lock.lock);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vma_start_write);
> >
> > Do any modules need it? If not we shouldn't export.
>
> I'm pretty sure I added it because of the allmodconfig build failure
> but let me rerun it and see which module was using it.
Yeah, when building allmodconfig without this export I get:
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/ext4/ext4.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/cramfs/cramfs.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/orangefs/orangefs.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [fs/erofs/erofs.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [drivers/acpi/pfr_telemetry.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__vma_start_write" [drivers/xen/xen-gntdev.ko] undefined!
>
> >
> > > /*
> > > * Lookup and lock a VMA under RCU protection. Returned VMA is guaranteed to be
> > > * stable and not isolated. If the VMA is not found or is being modified the
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists