linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Cleanup for memfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z3138rzvnzBMFEjw@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 10:52:34 -0800
From: Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@...gle.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
	jstultz@...gle.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com,
	kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Cleanup for memfd_create()

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 03:09:49PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 03:06:53PM -0800, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote:
> > memfd_create() handles all of its logic in a single function. Some of
> > the logic in the function is also somewhat contrived (i.e. copying the
> > memfd name from userpace).
> >
> > This series aims to cleanup memfd_create() by splitting out the logic
> > into helper functions, and simplifying the memfd name copying to make
> > the code easier to follow.
> >
> > This has no intended functional changes.
> >
> 
> What is this against? I tried b4 shazam'ing it against mm-unstable and it
> didn't apply. Could you rebase on mm-unstable?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Hi Lorenzo,

I had uploaded this against Linus' master branch. However, I've uploaded
a second version that is just a rebase on mm-unstable, as requested:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250107184804.4074147-1-isaacmanjarres@google.com/

Thanks,
Isaac