[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <flqpev4l6babygi3qwh23pahjvawpm2i5xdff6xh3k6v4qhqtm@uxsdrs62usju>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:02:06 -0500
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] padata: switch padata_find_next() to using
cpumask_next_wrap()
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:40AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
> the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.
>
> cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists