lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z30UXDVZi3Re_J9p@ryzen>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:47:40 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, kishon@...nel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rockswang7@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v8] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix overflow of bar_size

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 07:43:26PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025/1/7 19:33, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > Hi Niklas,
> > > 
> > > resource_size_t bar_size;
> > > remain = do_div((u64)bar_size, buf_size);
> > > 
> > > It works for the arm platform.
> > > 
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> > > static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> > > {
> > > 	register unsigned int __base      asm("r4") = base;
> > > 	register unsigned long long __n   asm("r0") = *n;
> > > 	register unsigned long long __res asm("r2");
> > > 	unsigned int __rem;
> > > 	asm(	__asmeq("%0", "r0")
> > > 		__asmeq("%1", "r2")
> > > 		__asmeq("%2", "r4")
> > > 		"bl	__do_div64"
> > > 		: "+r" (__n), "=r" (__res)
> > > 		: "r" (__base)
> > > 		: "ip", "lr", "cc");
> > > 	__rem = __n >> 32;
> > > 	*n = __res;
> > > 	return __rem;
> > > }
> > > #define __div64_32 __div64_32
> > > 
> > > #define do_div(n, base) __div64_32(&(n), base)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > For X86 platforms, do_div is a macro definition, and the first parameter
> > > does not define its type. If the macro definition is replaced directly, an
> > > error will be reported in the ubuntu20.04 release.
> > 
> > What is the error?
> > 
> > We don't need to use do_div().
> > The current code that does normal / and % works fine on both
> > 32-bit and 64-bit if you just do:
> > 
> >   static bool pci_endpoint_test_bar(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> >                                    enum pci_barno barno)
> >   {
> > -       int j, bar_size, buf_size, iters, remain;
> > +       int j, buf_size, iters, remain;
> >          void *write_buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
> >          void *read_buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
> >          struct pci_dev *pdev = test->pdev;
> > +       u64 bar_size;
> > 
> > No?
> 
> 
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> Please look at the robot compilation error.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20241231065500.168799-1-18255117159@163.com/
> 
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c:315: undefined reference to `__udivmoddi4'

That error was for your patch that changed bar_size to resource_size_t,
which is typedefed to phys_addr_t, which can be either 32-bits or 64-bits
on 32-bit systems (depending on CONFIG_X86_PAE).

I was suggesting to just change it to u64, so it will unconditionally be
64-bits.


Kind regards,
Niklas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ