linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 02/15] cpufreq: Add cpufreq_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025010727-banner-monday-1941@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:59:44 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
	Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 02/15] cpufreq: Add cpufreq_table_len()

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 04:51:35PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Add a function to calculate number of entries in the cpufreq table. This
> will be used by the Rust implementation.

Again, why is Rust unique here?  Why wouldn't the C code also need this?

> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 7fe0981a7e46..6b882ff4dc24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -783,6 +783,17 @@ bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
>  int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void);
>  bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>  
> +static inline unsigned int cpufreq_table_len(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table)
> +{
> +	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
> +	unsigned int count = 0;
> +
> +	cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, freq_table)
> +		count++;

No locking is needed?  Why does anyone care about the length of this
table?

thanks,

greg k-h