[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-7-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:47:37 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/14] btrfs: implement hole punching for RAID stripe
extents
From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
If the stripe extent we want to delete starts before the range we want to
delete and ends after the range we want to delete we're punching a
hole in the stripe extent:
|--- RAID Stripe Extent ---|
| keep |--- drop ---| keep |
This means we need to a) truncate the existing item and b)
create a second item for the remaining range.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 1 +
fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index c93f52a30a16028470594de1d1256dbec5c7899c..92071ca0655f0f1920eb841e77d3444a0e0d8834 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -3833,6 +3833,7 @@ static noinline int setup_leaf_for_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
BUG_ON(key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY &&
+ key.type != BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_KEY &&
key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY);
if (btrfs_leaf_free_space(leaf) >= ins_len)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
index 893d963951315abfc734e1ca232b3087b7889431..d15df49c61a86a4188b822b05453428e444920b5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
@@ -138,6 +138,55 @@ int btrfs_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 start, u64 le
trace_btrfs_raid_extent_delete(fs_info, start, end,
found_start, found_end);
+ /*
+ * The stripe extent starts before the range we want to delete
+ * and ends after the range we want to delete, i.e. we're
+ * punching a hole in the stripe extent:
+ *
+ * |--- RAID Stripe Extent ---|
+ * | keep |--- drop ---| keep |
+ *
+ * This means we need to a) truncate the existing item and b)
+ * create a second item for the remaining range.
+ */
+ if (found_start < start && found_end > end) {
+ size_t item_size;
+ u64 diff_start = start - found_start;
+ u64 diff_end = found_end - end;
+ struct btrfs_stripe_extent *extent;
+ struct btrfs_key newkey = {
+ .objectid = end,
+ .type = BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_KEY,
+ .offset = diff_end,
+ };
+
+ /* "right" item */
+ ret = btrfs_duplicate_item(trans, stripe_root, path,
+ &newkey);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ item_size = btrfs_item_size(leaf, path->slots[0]);
+ extent = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
+ struct btrfs_stripe_extent);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < btrfs_num_raid_stripes(item_size); i++) {
+ struct btrfs_raid_stride *stride = &extent->strides[i];
+ u64 phys;
+
+ phys = btrfs_raid_stride_physical(leaf, stride);
+ phys += diff_start + length;
+ btrfs_set_raid_stride_physical(leaf, stride, phys);
+ }
+
+ /* "left" item */
+ path->slots[0]--;
+ btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
+ btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent(trans, path, &key,
+ diff_start, 0);
+ break;
+ }
+
/*
* The stripe extent starts before the range we want to delete:
*
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists