[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173626870329.286960.5328606288066578023.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:38:56 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: anshuman.khandual@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com,
Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@...cinc.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
ardb@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com,
mark.rutland@....com,
joey.gouly@....com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn,
chenhuacai@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: Test for pmd_sect() in vmemmap_check_pmd()
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:40:47 +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote:
> Commit 2045a3b8911b ("mm/sparse-vmemmap: generalise vmemmap_populate_hugepages()")
> introduces the vmemmap_check_pmd() while does not verify if the entry is a
> section mapping, as is already done for Loongarch & X86.
> The update includes a check for pmd_sect(). Only if pmd_sect() returns true,
> further vmemmap population for the addr is skipped.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/mm), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: mm: Test for pmd_sect() in vmemmap_check_pmd()
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/9ab2601dc4c1
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists