[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z37gr-4tS5SFhFHi@x1>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:31:43 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Yonatan Goldschmidt <yonatan.goldschmidt@...nulate.io>
Cc: Francesco Nigro <fnigro@...hat.com>, Ilan Green <igreen@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v1] Processing java JIT dumps from containers
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 04:51:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 05:48:23PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> >
> Hi,
> >
> > This is trying to move the needle on supporting jitdump done
> > from a container while perf is running from the outside, that is not
> > working right now.
> >
> > I tried to collect as much details on what is being done in the
> > commit logs to document further work that needs to be done to support
> > such a scenario in a streamlined way, but what in this patchkit at least
> > helped in a real case, allowing us to get 'perf annotate' to work and
> > confirm suspicions.
>
> I'm going to apply this to perf-tools-next, please holler if you
> disagree.
Applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists