[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250108204011.GA1342186@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:40:11 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] PCI: Make pcie_read_tlp_log() signature same
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> pcie_read_tlp_log()'s prototype and function signature diverged due to
> changes made while applying.
>
> Make the parameters of pcie_read_tlp_log() named identically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Just wondering, could this be squashed into the previous patch? Or is
the goal to be strict with one logical change per patch?
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists