[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250108221318.GA232458@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:13:18 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] PCI: Make pcie_read_tlp_log() signature same
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:40:11PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > pcie_read_tlp_log()'s prototype and function signature diverged due to
> > changes made while applying.
> >
> > Make the parameters of pcie_read_tlp_log() named identically.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
>
> Just wondering, could this be squashed into the previous patch? Or is
> the goal to be strict with one logical change per patch?
I haven't looked closely enough to opine on whether this should be
squashed, but I generally do prefer one logical change per patch.
It's much easier for me to squash things when merging than it is to
untangle things that should be separate patches.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists