[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e9d3fa3-7951-4d26-a63a-d16927cb4a78@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:12:58 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] jbd2: remove stale comment of update_t_max_wait
On 2024/12/25 4:27, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Commit 2d44292058828 "jbd2: remove CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG to update t_max_wait"
> removed jbd2_journal_enable_debug, just remove stale comment about
> jbd2_journal_enable_debug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> index 66513c18ca29..e00b87635512 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static void jbd2_get_transaction(journal_t *journal,
> * t_max_wait is carefully updated here with use of atomic compare exchange.
> * Note that there could be multiplre threads trying to do this simultaneously
> * hence using cmpxchg to avoid any use of locks in this case.
> - * With this t_max_wait can be updated w/o enabling jbd2_journal_enable_debug.
> */
> static inline void update_t_max_wait(transaction_t *transaction,
> unsigned long ts)
Hi, Kemeng,
It seems that the first sentence in this comment should be removed
together, as it also appears staled.
"Update transaction's maximum wait time, if debugging is enabled."
Thanks,
Yi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists