[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z34NGyZL7G_j716N@tlindgre-MOBL1>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 07:28:59 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] TDX vCPU/VM creation
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:41:51PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> On 7.01.25 г. 9:37 ч., Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ __read_mostly DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > __read_mostly DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(apic_hw_disabled, HZ);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apic_hw_disabled);
>
> Is it really required to expose this symbol? apic_hw_disabled is defined as
> static inline in the header?
For loadable modules yes, otherwise we'll get:
ERROR: modpost: "apic_hw_disabled" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
This is similar to the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu) already
there.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists