[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450da9ec-d754-4dea-99c7-d5730e35a284@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:06:37 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings
On 07/01/2025 14:01, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>> index 05a9cb36cd82..f0b7758ab29f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ description: |
>>> properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> enum:
>>> + - silergy,sq52206
>>
>> So it is compatible or not? You said same bindings, but not compatible?
>>
>
> What I mean is that SQ52206 is compatible.the datasheet depends on
Then compatibility should be expressed in fallback, but OTOH, your
linked changes suggest these are not compatible. Confusing commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists