[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250108085132.GD23315@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:51:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>, void@...ifault.com,
arighi@...dia.com, mingo@...hat.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] sched_ext: Support high-performance monotonically
non-decreasing clock
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 09:55:16AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:53:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > The patch series generally look good to me. Peter, if things look okay to
> > > > you, I'll apply the series to sched_ext/for-6.14.
> > >
> > > Applying to sched_ext/for-6.14. Please holler if there are concerns.
> >
> > Urgh, I'll try and have a look, but have a hate for everybody who's been
> > working through x-mas :/
>
> Ah, I'm just back too. FWIW, the patchset is a lot simpler now, so hopefully
> there shouldn't be too much to object to. I'll hold off until you can take a
> look.
Thanks! Code does appear simpler now. But I think there's an ordering
issue, I've replied to the patch in question.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists